|
Бершптейн М.С. Обучение и воспитание одаренных детей в США. //Сов. педагогика; М., 1961, N6. - с. 118-126.
Богоявленская Д.Б. Об одном из подходов к исследованию интеллектуального творчества. //Вопр. психологии; М., 1976, N4. - с. 69-79.
Богоявленская Д.Б. Интеллектуальная активность как проблема творчества. -Изд-во Ростов, ун-та. 1983. - 176 с.
Большакова В.В. Очерки истории русской психологии (XIX -нач. XX в.). -Н.Новгород: Изд-во Волго-Вятского кадрового центра, 1994. -160 с.
Брушлинскии А.В. Психология мышления и кибернетика. - М.: Педагогика, 1970. -191 с.
Брушлинскии А.В. О природных предпосылках психического развития человека. - М.: Знание, 1977. - 64с.
Брушлинскии А. В. Проблемы психологии субъекта. - М., 1994. - 109 с.
Брюно Ж. и др. Одаренные дети: психолого-педагогические исследования и практика. //Психологический журнал; М., 1995, N4. - с.73-76.
Венгер Л.А. Педагогика способностей. - М.: Знание, 1973. - 96с. Ю.Веракса Н.Е., Дьяченко О.М. Еще не поздно. - М.: Знание, 1992. - с.27-83, 11 .Выготский Л.С. Воображение и творчество в детском возрасте. - М.:
Просвещение, 1991. - 93с. 12.Гильбух Ю.З. Внимание: одаренные дети. - М.: Знание, 1991. - 79с. ІЗ.Гуревич К.М. Профессиональная пригодность и основные свойства нервной
системы. - М.: Наука, 1970. - 272 с. 14.Гусева Е.П. и др. Некоторые психологические и психофизиологические черты
математически одаренных подростков. //В сб.: Новыдосследования в
психологии и возрастной физиологии. - М.: Педагогика, 1989, N2. - с.23-26, 15.Дьяченко О.М., Кириллова Т.С. О некоторых особенностях развития
воображения у детей дошкольного возраста. //Вопр. психологии; М., 1980, N2. -
с. 107-117.
Іб.Ермолаева-Томина Л.Б. Проблемы развития творческих способностей детей
(по материалам зарубежных исследований). //Вопр. психологии; М., 1975, N5. -
с.166-176. 17.Капица П. Л. Некоторые принципы творческого воспитания и образования.
//Вопр. философии; М„ 1980, N2, - с. 64-86. 18. К овал ев А. Г., Мясищев В.Н. Психические особенности человека.
//Способности. - Л.: ЛГУ, 1960, Т.Н. 19.Козырева А.Ю. Лекции по педагогике и психологии творчества. - Пенза: НМЦ
Пего. ГорОНО, 1994. - 344с. 20.Крутецкий В.А. Психология математических способностей школьников. - М.:
Просвещение, 1968. - 431с. 21.Курбатова И.А. Возможности полимодального подхода в диагностике детской
одаренности. //Вопр. психологии; М., 1995, N 2. - с. 59-65. 22. Левочкина И.А. Соотношение произвольной и непроизвольной регуляции
деятельности у учапщхся с высоким уровнем развития музыкальных
способностей. //В сб.: Новые исследования в психологии. - М.: Педагогика,
1987,N2.-с,45-47. 23.Лейтес Н.С. Об умственной одаренности. - М.: Изд. АПН РСФСР, 1960 - 256с. 24.Лейтсс Н.С. Способности, труд, талант. - М., 1961. 25.Лейтес Н.С. Умственные способности и возраст. - М.: Педагогика, 1971 - 279с.
Лейтес Н.С. На пути к изучению самых общих предпосылок способностей.
//Проблемы дифференциальной психофизиологии. - М: Педагогика, 1972,
T.VII. 27.Лсйтес Н.С. Об изучении проблемы склонностей в русле идей Б.М.Теплова.
//Вопр. психологии; М., 1976, N5. - с.45-54. 28.Лейтес Н.С. Возрастные особенности развития склонностей, //Проблемы
общей, возрастной и педагогической психологии. - М.: Педагогика, 1978. 29.Лейтес Н.С. Способности и одаренность в детские годы. - М.: Знание, 1984. -
80с.
ЗО.Лейтсс Н.С. Проблема соотношения возрастного и индивидуального в способностях школьников. //Вопр. психологии; М, 1985, N1.-с.9-18.
ЗІ.ЛейтесН.С. Ранние проявления одаренности. //Вопр. психологии; М., 1988, N4. - с.98-107.
ЛейгесН.С. Возрастная одаренность. //Семья и школа. М,, 1990. N9.
ЗЗ.Матюшкин А.М. Проблемные ситуации в обучении. - М.: Педагогика, 1972. -208 с.
Матюшкин А.М. Концепции творческой одаренности. //Вопр. психологии; М., 1989, N6.
Матюшкин А.М. Загадки одаренности. - М: Школа-пресс, 1993. - 125с. Зб.Матюшкин А.М., Сиск Д.А. Одаренные и талантливые дети. //Вопр.
психологии; М., 1988, N4. - с.88-97.
Меде В., Пиорковский Г. Детская одаренность, Экспериментальные методы отбора одаренных детей. - Мм 1915.
Немов Р.С. Психология. Т.І. - М.: Просвещение, 1994. - с,315-328. 39.0даренные дети. /Перевод с англ. - М.: Прогресс, 1991. - 376с.
Платонов К.К. Проблемы способностей. - М.: Наука, 1972. - 312с.
41 .Платонов К.К. Краткий словарь системы психологических понятий. - М.:
Высшая школа, 1984. - 174с. 42.Пономарев Я.А. Знания, мышление и умственное развитие. - М.: Просвещение,
1967. - 264 с. 43.Пономарев Я А. Психология творчества и педагогика. - М.: Педагогика, 1976,
с. 7-44, 44.ПономаревЯ.А. Психология творчества. - М.: Наука, 303 с. 45.Россолямо Г.И. Психологические профили. Методика. - СПб., 1910. 46.Рубшшггейн С.Л. Проблемы общей психологии. - М.: Педагогика, 1976. - 416с. 47,Рубишптсйн С.Л. Способности. //Основы общей психологии. М.: Педагогика,
1989. Т.І.-485с.
СергееваН.И. Обучение одаренных детей в школах Англии: Автореф. дисс....
канд. психол. наук. - М., 1991. - 16с. 49.Способности и склонности: комплексные исследования. /Под ред. Э. А.
Голубевой. - М.: Педагогика, 1989. - 200с. 50.Тафель Р.Е. Анализ исследований творческих способностей в американской
психологии. //Вопр. Психологии; М., 1972, N4. - с. 166-174. 51.Теплов Б.М. Психология: Учебник для средней школы. - М.: Учпедгиз, 1953.-
255с. 52.Теплов Б.М. Способности и одаренность. //Психология индивидуальных
различий. /Под ред. Гиппенрейгер Ю.Б. - М.: Изд. МГУ, 1982. - с.123-138. 53.Теплов Б.М. Избранные труды: Т. ІДІ. - М.: Педагогика, 1985.; Т.І. - 329с;
ТЛІ- 359с. 54.Тихомиров O.K. Психология мышления. - М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1984. - 207 с.
Тищенко Е. Г. Развитие системы обучения одаренных учащихся в
общеобразовательных школах США: Автореф. дисс....канд. психол. наук. - М.,
1993. - 18с. 56.Унт И. Э. Индивидуализация и дифференциация обучения. - М.: Педагогика,
1990.. 188с. 57,Челпанов Г.И. Проблема культуры талантов. (Неопубликовано)//Из архива
А.П. Чернова, профессора кафедры психологии НГПУ. 58.Чудновскнй В.Э., Юркевич ВС. Одаренность: дар или испытание. - М.;
Знание, 1990. - 80с. 59.Шумакова Н.Б. и др. Исследование творческой одаренности с использованием
тестов П. Торренса у младших школьников. //Вопр. психологии; М, 1991, N1. -
с. 27-32. бО.Шумакова Н.Б. Развитие одаренности детей младшего школьного возраста в
условиях экспериментального обучения. //В сб.: Новые исследования в
психологии и возрастной физиологии. - М; Педагогика, 1991, N2. - с.44-49. 61. Штерн В. Психологические методы испытаний умственной одаренности в их
применении к детям школьного возраста. -Пг., 1915. 62.Щебланова Е.И. Индивидуальные особенности развития творческого
мышления у младших школьников при специальном обучении. //В сб.: Новые
исследования в психологии и возрастной физиологии. - М.: Педагогика, 1991,
с.34-38. бЗ.Экземплярский В.М. Проблема одаренности. - М., 1923. 64. Экземплярский В.М. Проблема школ для одаренных. - М., Л., 1927. б5.ЮркевичВ.С. Изучение общей одаренности за рубежом. //Вопр. психологии. -
M.,1971,N4.-c.l54-163. 66. Abramson, D.A. (1959) The encctiviness of grouping for students of high ability.
Educational Research Bulletin. 38,169-182. 67 .According to their needs (1979) A description of and commentary on good practice in
schools. NAGC. 68.Anastasi, A. (1970) On the formation of psychological traits.ЛЕІПШ
Psychologist. 25,899-910.
Baer, C.J. (1956) The school progress and adjustmen of underage and overage
students. Elementary School Journal. 55,331-336. 70.Benbow, C.P. (1979) The components of SMPYs smorgasboard of accelerative
options. Intellectually Talented Youth Bulletin. 5,21-23. 71.Bigclow, E.B. (1934) School progress of underage children.
Journal. 35,186-192. 72.Bloom, B.S., and Sosniak, L.A. (1981) Talent development vs.schooling.
Leadership. 39, 86-94.
College, Columbia University, New York and London. 74.Brody, L.E., and Stanley, J.C. (1991) Young college students. Assessing factors that
contribute to success. In W.T.Southern and E.D.Jones (eds) The academic
acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102-132) New York: Teachers College Press 75.Brookover, W.G., Peterson, A., and Thomas, S. (1962) Self-concept of ability and
school achievement. East Lansing, Mich.; Michigan State University 76.Bruner, J.S. (1973) Beyond the informatmn given . New York: Norton 77.Buchanan, N. and Nielsen, M. (1991) In pursuit of a problem. In Conducting
research evaluation in gifted education. A Handbook of Methods and Applications.
(eds. Nina K. Buchanan, John F.Feldhusen) Teachers College, Columbia
University, N.Y. and London
Burks, B.S., Jensen, D.W. and Terman, L.M. (1930) The Promise of Youth: Follow-up Studies of a Thousand Gifted Children. In L.M. Terman (ed.) Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. III. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 508 pp.
Carroll,J.B. (1968) Review of the nature of human intelligence by J.P.Guilford. American Educational Research Journal, 73,105-112.
overage third grades . Chicago: Rand McNally 81.Carter, L.B. (1956) The effect of early school entrance on the scholastic achievement of elementary school children in the Austin public schools. Journal of Educational
J&SSCaicJi, 50,91-103, 82.Clark, B. (1979) Growing up Gifted. Columbus, OH: Charles E.Merrill
Schools Council. 84.Colangelo,N., and Dettman, D.F. (1983) Acquisition of formal operations by
intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly. 26(3), 110-115. 85.Coleman, J.S. (1960) The adolescent subculture and academic achievement.
Атпегіг-яп Journal of Sociology. 65, 337-346. 86.Cornell, D.G., Gallahan, СМ., Bassin, L.E., and Ramsay, S.G. (1991) Affective
development in accelerated students. In W.T Southern and E.D.Jones (eds) The
academic achievement of pfted children. (pp. 74-101) New York: Teachers College
Press 87.Cox, С (1926) The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. In Terman,
L.M. fed.~) Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. II, Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press. 88.Daurio, S.P. (1979) Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the
literature. In W.C.George, SJ.Cohn, and J.C.Stanley (eds.) Educating the gifted:
Acceleration and enrichment, (pp. 13-63) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Davis, F.B., French, E., and Lesser, G.S. (195?)
behavior of elementary school cfrfldren gifted in five different mental characteristics.
Hunter College, New York 90.Davis, G.A. and Rimm, S.B. (1988) Education of the gifted and talented. (2nd edn).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 91.Dispasquale, G.W., Moule, A., andFlewelling, R.W. (1980) The birthdate effect.
Drawatzky, J.H. (1981) Tracking and ability grouping in education. Journal of Law
Drews, E. (1980) The gifted student: A Researcher's View. In Reading in Foundations of Gifted Education (ed. by David M. Jackson) Guilford, Conn: Special Learning Corporation.
Dunstan, J. (1983) Attitudes to Provision for Gifted Children: The Case of the USSR. In Face to Face with Giftedness (eds. Shore, B, et aL) New York: Trillim Press.
Durr, W. (1964) The Gifted Child. Oxford University Press, New York.
Eash, M.J. (1961) Grouping, what have we learned? Educational Leadership. 18,
429-434. 97.Educational Opportunities for All? (1985) Inner London Education Authority. 98.Ekstrom, R.B. (1961) Experimental studies of homogeneous grouping: a critical
review. School Review. 69,216-226. 99.Feldhusen, J.F. (1991) Effects of programs for the gifted: A search for evidence. In
W.T. Southern and E.D. Jones (eds) The academic acceleration of gifted children.
(pp. 133-147) New York: Teachers College Press
lOO.Fliegler, L. and Bish, С (1959) Summary of Research on the Academically Talented
Student. Review of Educational Research, 29, 408-450. lOl.Forester, JJ. (1955) At what age should a child start school? School Executive, 74,
80-81. 102.Freeman, F.N. (1920) Provision in the elementary school for superior children.
Gallagher, J.J. (1975) Teaching the gifted child. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon 104.Gallagher, JJ.(1981) Differentiating curriculum for the gifted in different cultures.
In J. Freeman (Ed.) The psychology of gifted children: Perspectives on development
and education. (pp.335-350), Chester, UK: Wiley 105.Gammeran, A. and Berends, M. (1987) The effects of stratification in secondary
schools: Synthesis of Survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational
Research, 57,415-435.
York: Basic Books. 107.Garge, F. (1983) Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles, disagreement over modalities. British Columbia Journal of Special
Education, 7,113-127.
George, D. (199 The Challenge of the Able Child. London: David Fulton
Publishers. 109.George, P.S. (1988) What's the truth about tracking and ability grouping really?
Gainesville, Fl: Teacher eduation Resources 110.Oiftgd ГЫЫгеп in Middle and Comprehensive Schools. (1977) Department of
Education and Science. HMSO. 11 l.Goertzel, M.G., Goertzel, V., and Goertzel, T.G. (1978) Ч0П Eminent personalities .
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 112.Goertzel, V. and Goertzel, M.G. (1962) Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little Brown 113.Goldberg, M.L. and Passow, A.H. (1962) The effects of ability grouping.
Education. 82,482-487. '
114-Gowcn, J.C. (1971)
gifted children. Itasca: Peacock
115-Gowen, J.C, (1977) Background and History of the Gifted Child Movement. In J.C
Stanley, W.C. George, & C.H. Solano (eds.) The Gifted and Creative. Baltimore:
The John Hopkins University Press. 116.Gowen, J.C, Khatena, J., and Torrance, E.P. (eds.) (1981) Creativity: Its
Educational Implications. rev. ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishing Co. H7.Greenberg, В., andBruner, H. B. (1941) Final report on the Speyer school
yxpfrrime^ . Publication No. 12. New York, Board of Education. U8.Greenlaw, M. and Mcintosh, M. (1988 Educating the Gifted: A source book.
American Library. 119Guilford,J.P. (1959) Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist. 14. 469-479.
Guilford, J.P. (1967) The nature of Unman ™fc№g«m. New York;McGraw-Hill 121.Guilford, J.P. (1973) Theories of intelligence. In B.B. Wolman (ed.) Handbook of
general psychology, (pp, 639-643). Englewood CliiTs, NJ: Prratice-Hali 122.Hall, R.V. (1963) Does entrance age affect achievement? Elementary School
Ismail 63,391-396. 123.Hallahan, D. and Kauffman, J. (1978). Exceptional children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall. 124.Henry, R. (1920) Classroom Problems in the Education of Gifted Children. In 19th
Chicago Press, Chicago.
І 48
Hilderbraund, S. (1981) Democracy's aristocrat: gifted child in America, (pp. 191-196). School library and Information Science State University of New York, Geneseo: New York
Hildrcth, G. П966Ї Introduction to the gifted. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Hobson, J.R. (1946) Mental age as a workable criterion for school admission. Elementary School Journal, 48, 312-321.
Hobson, J.R. (1963) High school perfomance of pupils initially admitted to kindergarten on the basis of physical and psychological examinations. and Psychological Measurement. 23,159-170.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1926) Gifted Children: Their Nature and Nurture. New York: Macmillan.
York: World Book Co. 131.Horn, J.L., and Knapp,J.R. (1973) On the subjective character of the empirical base
of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin. 80, 33-43. 132.Hoylc, К and Wilks, J. (1975) Gifted Children and their Education. Department of
Education and Science, London. 133.Hunter College Elementary School Faculty (1958) Gifted childen as we see them.
New York, Hunter College Elementary School. Inc. New York & London. 134.The Intellectually Gifted. An Overview (1976) (eds, Dennis W. and Dennis M.)
Crune and Stratton, New York. 135. Intelligence and its measurement. A symposium (1921). Journal of Educational
Psychology. 12,123-147,195-216, 271-275. 136Jensen, A.R. (1982) Reaction time and psycometric. In H.J. Eysenk (ed.) A model
for intelligence. Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag 137. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Maruyama, G. (1983) Independence and
interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A
theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Research in
Education. 53,415-424. 138.Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D.t and Skon,L.(1981) Effects
of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A
meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89,47-62. 139. Jones, E.D. and Southern, W.T. (1991) Objections to early entrance and grade
skipping. In W.T.Southern and E.D.Jones (eds.)
gifted children, (pp. 51-74) New York: Teachers College Press 140Justman,J. (1952)
enrolled in special progress and normal progress classes injunior high school. New
York, Board of Education 141.Kaplan, S.N. (1979) Language, arts and the social studies curriculum in elementary
development: Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of
Education. Part I (pp. 155-168). Chicago: University of Chicago Press 142.Karnes, M- (ed.) (1986) The underserved: our young gifted children. Teachers
College Columbia University, New York. 143.Khatena, J. (1982) Educational Psychology of the Gifted. John Wiley & Sons. 144.King, LB. (1955) Effect of age of entrance into grade 1 upon achievement in
elementary school. Elementary School Journal 55,331-336. 145.Kitano, M.K., and Kirby,D.F. (1986)
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kulik, C.-L.C. (1985) Effects of inter-class ability grouping on achievement and self-esteem. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Los-Angeles, CA.
Kulik, C.-L.C, and Kulik, J. A.(1984) Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. On-tario, Canada.
Kulik, J. A (1990) Ability grouping and gifted students. In N.Colangelo, and GA.Davis (ods.) Handbook of gifted education.fpp. 178-196) Boston: Allyn and Bacon
contemporary perspectives. Research-based Decision Making series. Storrs,CT:
The National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented, University of
Connecticut. ISO.Kulik, J.A. and Kulik, C.-L.C. (1982) Effects of ability of evaluation findings.
American Educational Research Journal. 19,415-428. ISLKulik, J.A. and Kulik, C-L.C. (1984) Effects of accelerated instruction on students.
Review of EaflEtttjftfflrt Rfty^mhT 54, 409-428.
1985. M. Ed. Dissertation. Center for Special Needs, University of Manchester,
Great Britain. 153. Lally, A. and La Brant, L. (1951) Experiences with children talented in the arts. In
The Gifted Child (ed. P. Witty) DC Heath, New York. 154.Luchins, A.S., and Luchins, E.H. (1948) Children's attitudes toward homogeneous
MacKinnon, D. (1964) The creativity of architects. In Widening Horizon In
ivitv, (cd. C. Taylor) Wiley, New York, 156.Maddux, CD. (1983) Early school entry for the gifted: New evidence and concerns.
Maddux, CD., Stacy, D. and Scott, M. (1981) School entry age in a group of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly. 4,180-183.
Mann, M. (1957) How real are friendships of gifted and typical children in a program of partial segregation? р^щй**Н<гі Children. 23,199-201.
Mann, M. (1960) What does ability grouping do to the Self-conceprt. Childhood
Edgfiatiffib 36, 357-360. 160.Mawhinney, P.E. (1964) We gave up on early entrance. Education Digest. 30, 8-9.
McCurdy, H.G (1960) The chilhood pattern of genius. Horizon. 2, 33-38. 162.McLeod, J. and Cropley, A. (1989) Fostering academic excellence. Pergamon Press
Oxford. 163.McNemar, Q. (1964) Lost: Our Intelligence - Why? Ашиї^п Psychologist. 19,
871-882,
Monks, P. and Boxtel, H. (1985) Gifted adolescents: a developmental perspective. In J. Freeman (cd.) The psychology of gifted children. John Willey & Sons, Chichester.
National Commision on Exellence in Education (1983) A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington D.C.: Author.
National Society for the Study of Education (1936) The grouping of pupils. Thirty-fifth Yearbook, Parti. Bloomington, 111., Public School Publishing Co.
Norris, D.E. (1958) Programs in the elementary shook. In N.B.Henry (ed.),
of Education, Part I. (pp. 222-242) Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 168,Oakes, J. (1985) Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
169-Orbzut, A., Nelson, R.B., and Orbzut, J.E. (1984) Early school entrance for
intellectually superior children: An analysis. Psychology in the Schoob. 21, 3-93, 170.Osburn, W.J., and Rohan, B.J. (1931) Enriching the curriculum for gifted children.
New York:Macmillan. 171.Passow, A.H. (1959) Are we shortchanging the qifted? In Educating the Gifted. A
fronlc nf r^adi^gs (cd. Joseph L. French) Henry Holt and Company, New York. 172.Passow, A.H. (1962) The maze of the research on ability grouping. Educational
Евшт, 26,281-288. 173.Passow, A.H. (1993) The Year 2000 and Beyond. In International Handbook of
Passow) Pergamon Press, Inc. 174.Passow, A.H. and Goldberg, M.L. (1961) The Talented Youth Project: A Progress
Report. Horace Mannlineoln Institute of School Experimentation. New York,
Teachers College, Columbia University 175.Passow,A.H., Goldberg, M., Tannenbaum, A., and French, W. (1955) Planning for
talented youth. New York:Teachers College Press. 176.Piaget, J. (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International
Universities Press. 177.Pollins, L.D. (1983) The effects of acceleration on the social and emotional
development of gifted students. In C.P. Bcnbow and J.C. Stanley (eds.) Academic
precocity, (pp. 160-178). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
of Educational Research Monographs, No.31. Columbus: Ohio State University
Press. 179.Pressey, S.L. (1954) That most misunderstood concept, acceleration. School and
Society, 79,59-60. 180.Pressey, S.L. (1955) Concerning the nature and nurture of genius. Scientific
Monthly, 81,123-129. 181.Pritchard, M. (1951) The contribution of Let a S. Hollingworth to the study of gifted
children. In The Gifted Child (ed. P. Witty) D. C. Heath, New York. 182.Reis, S. & Renzulli, J. (1982) A research report on the revolving door identification
model: A case for broadened conception of giftedness. Phi Delta KappaT 63, 619-620. 183.Renzulli, J.S. (1977) Thg enricfryinent triad model: A guide for developing defensible
brthe edfted. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press
Renzulli, J.S. (1978) What makes giftedness? Phi Delta Kappa. 60,180-184. 185.Renzulli, J.S. (1979) In W.C. George, S.J.Cohn, and J.C. Stanley(eds.) Educating
the gifted: Acceleration and ftn«^T"«»t (pp 10-101) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press. 186.Renzulli, J. S. (1986) The three-ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model
for creative productivity. In R. Sternberg and J. Davidson (eds.) Conceptions of
Giftedness. Cambridge University Press. 187.Rcnzulli, J., Owen, S. (1983) The revolving door identification model: If it isn't
busted, don't fix it; If you don't understand it, don't mix it. Roeper Review. 6, 39-41. 188.Renzulli, J., Reis, S. & Smith, L. (1981) The revolving door identification model.
Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. 189.Robinson, A. (1990) Point-countpoint: Cooperation or exploitation? The argument
against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the
(Щ 14,9-27. 190.Robinson, A. (1992) Cooperative learning яп/і thg academically talented student.
Research-based Decision Making Series, Storrs, CT: The National Research Centre
on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Robinson, H.B. (1977) Current myths concerning gifted children. Gifted and talented brief. No. 5 (pp. 1-11) Ventura, Calif.: National/State Leadership Training Institute
Robinson, N.M., and Wcimer, L.J. (1991) Selection of candidates for early admission to kindergarten and first grade. In W.T. Southern and E.D. Jones (eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children. (pp. 2-Ю). New York: Teachers College Press.
Rogers, K.B. (1991)
options for gifted students. Paper presented at the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
gifted and talented learners. Research-based Decision Making Series. Storrs, CT:
National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Rogers, K.B. (1993) Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers.
Seagoe, M.V. (1972) Terman and the Gifted. Elementary School Principal. Vol. 51,
p. 76-78. 197.Shane, H.G., and McSwain, E.T. (1958) Evaluation and the Elementary
Curriculum. Revised edition. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston 198.Simpson, R.E., and Martinson, R.A. (1961) Educational programs for gifted pupils.
Sacramento, California State Department of Education 199.Sisk, D.A. (1979) Unusual gifts and talents. In M.S. Lilly (ed.) Children with
exceptional needs. (pp. 362-397) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 200.Slavin, R.E. (1987) Ability-grouping: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of
Slavin, R.E. (1990) Cooperative Learning: Theory, research and practice.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 202.Slavin, R.E. (1990) Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools:
A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Rcsearchr 60, 471-499. 203.Solano, C.H. (1977) Teacher and pupil stereotypes of gifted boys and girls. Talents
ашШШб, 19, 4-8. 204.Southern, W.T., and Jones, E.D. (1991) Academic acceleration: Background and
issues. In W.T. Southern and RD. Jones (eds.)
gifted children . (pp. 1-29). New York: Teachers College Press. 205.Southern, W.T., Jones, E.D. and Fiscus, E.D. (1989a) Academic
Concerns of gifted students and their parents. Paper presented at the annual meeting
of the National Association for Gifted Children, Cincinnati. 206. Southern, W.T., Jones, E.D. and Fiscus, E.D. (1989b) Practitioner objections to the
academic acceleration of young gifted children. Qjfted СЩ$ Quarterly, 33, 29-35. 207.Spearman, C.E. (1927) Abilities of man: Tbejf natures and measurement. New
York: Macmillan 208. Stanley, J.C. (1977) Rationale for the study of mathematically precocious youth
(SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In J.C.
Stanley, W.G. George, and C.H. Solano (eds.) The gifted and creative: A fifty-vear
perspective, (pp.75-112) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 209.Stanley, J.C. (1989) He did it! Gifted Child Today. 12, 40. 210,Stanley, J.C. (1991) Reflections on my life and how it grew. In D.L. Burleson (ed.),
Reflections: Personal essays by 33 distinguished educators, (pp. 340-355).
Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
21 I.Stanley, J.C., and Benbow, C.P. (1986) Youths who reason extremely well mathematically. In R.J. Sternberg and I.E. Davidson (eds.) Conceptions of giftedness. (pp. 361-387). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Stedman, L.M. (1924) Education of gifted children. Yonkerson-Hudson, NY: World.
Stcin, M. П986Ї Gifted. Talented, and Creative Young People: A Guide to Thcor Teaching and Research. Garland Publishing, Inc. New York & London
reflsntiing: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbraum 215. Sternberg, R.J. (1980) Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence. Behavioral лпЛ Rrain Sciences. 3, 573-584
Sternberg, R.J. (1981) Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educationa
Psychology. 25, 86-93. 217. Sternberg, R.J. (1982a) Lies we live by: Misaplication of tests in identifying the
gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly. 26, 157-161
Sternberg, R.J. (1982b) Nonentrechment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly. 26, 63-67. 4 219.Sternberg, R. J. (1984) Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 7, 264-316.
Cambridge University Press. 221. Sternberg, R. J. (1986) A triarchic theory of intellectual gjlftedness. In R. Sternberg
and J. Davidson (pds.) Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press 222.Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B.E., Ketron, J.L., and Bernstein, M.(1981) People's
conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Pfrggftflftty and Social Psychology. 41, 37-55. 1 223.Sternberg, R.J., and Rowcll, J.S. (1983) Comprehending verbal comprehension.
American Psychologist. 38,878-893. і 224.Sternberg, R. J. and Wagner, R.K. (1982, July) Automatization: failure in learning
disabilities. Topics in leaning $щА learning disabilities . 2,1-11. 225.Sternberg, R.J. and Weil, E.M. (1980) An aptitude - strategy, interaction in linear
syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 72, 226-234. 226,Sumpton, M.R. (1941) Three hundred gifted children. New York, Harcourt,Brace
& World - 227.Tannenbaum,A.J.(1962) Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance.
Talented youth project monograph. New York: Teachers College, Columbia
University 228,Tannenbaum. A. J. (1983) Gifted children: Psychological and Educational
perspectives. New York: MacMillan. 229.Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986) Giftedness: a psychological approach. In R. Sternberg
and J. Davidson (eds.) Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press. 230.Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986) Psychosocial conception of giftedness. In R. Sternberg
and J. Davidson (eds.) Conceptions of giftedness. (pp.21-55) Cambridge University
Press. 231.Terman,L,M. (І925) Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. In
Terman, L.M. (ed.) Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol, I. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press, 648pp. 232.Terman, L.M. (1954) The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent.
Terman, L.M. and Oden, M.H. (1947) The Gifted Child Grows Up. In Terman, L.M. fed.^ Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. IV. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 448 pp.
Terman, L.M. and Oden, M.H. (1959) The Gifted Group at Mid- Life: Thirty-five years. Follow-up of the Superior Child, In Terman, L.M. (ed.) Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. V. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 187 pp.
Tuttle, R and Becker, L. 11980 Characteristics and identification of Gifted and Talented. Students National Educational Association, Washington, DC.
Uphoff, J.K., and Gilmore, J. (1986) Pupil age and school entrance - How many are ready for success? Young Children. 41,11-16.
Vaughn, V.L., Feldhusen, J., and Asher, W.(1991) Meta-analysis and review of research on pull-out programms in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly. 35, 92-98.
Vernon, P.E. (1950) The structure of human abilities . New York: Wiley
Walters, B. (1987) Curriculum design and delivery - the able ch#d. Report to schools and special services committee. CIwyd Local Education Authority.
Ward, V. (1975) Basic concepts. In Psychology and Education of the Gifted, (eds. W. Barbe and J. Renzulli) Wiley, London.
Wasserman, S, (1982), The gifted can't weight that giraffe. Phi Delta KappaT 53, 621-
Whitmore, J.R. (1980) Giftcdncssr conflict, and underachievement. Allyn and
Bacon, Inc.
Wilhehns,F.R. (1958) The nature of classroom grouping for learning. Paper read at America conference of Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. San Francisco State College
Witty, P.A. (1940) A Genetic Study of Fifty Gifted Children. In Intelligence: Its
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 246. Wrightstone, J.W. (1957) Clftfifi ftrgfflli;ration for instruction, What research says to the teacher, No 13. Washington, DC. National Education Association
| 
